Ghana’s power sector is edging into a “higher-risk zone” as rising electricity demand continues to outstrip critical investments in transmission infrastructure.

Ghana’s power sector is drifting into dangerous territory, and the alarm is growing louder. As electricity demand climbs on the back of stronger economic activity and rising household consumption, the infrastructure meant to carry that power across the country is struggling to keep pace. The result, analysts warn, is a system under mounting stress,  and one that may not hold if urgent action is not taken.

That is the sobering assessment of the Institute for Energy Security (IES), whose latest analysis paints a picture of a grid buckling under the weight of its own growth. Peak demand has now surpassed 4,280 MW, a figure that reflects a busier, more energetic economy,  but the transmission network has not grown with it.

“The system is increasingly characterised by congested transmission corridors, rising technical losses, overloaded infrastructure, and ageing, obsolete equipment,” the IES analysis noted, warning that these combined pressures “pose a direct threat to grid stability, system reliability, and the efficiency of power delivery.”

In plain terms: Ghana’s power system is entering a higher-risk zone, and without timely intervention, supply shortfalls,  especially during peak demand periods,  are no longer a distant possibility.

The economic stakes could hardly be higher. A power sector riddled with inefficiencies drives up operational costs for businesses, erodes industrial productivity, and slows economic growth. For a country with ambitious development targets, an unreliable grid is not just an inconvenience; it is a structural liability.

The IES is not merely sounding the alarm. It is also offering a roadmap out.

The think tank is calling on government, regulators, and development partners to treat transmission network reinforcement as a matter of national strategic importance. The proposals it has put forward are wide-ranging and technically specific, but they share a common thread: the grid needs to be modernised, expanded, and made more resilient,  now, not later.

At the heart of the recommendations is the need to upgrade existing transmission infrastructure with high-capacity conductors to ease system overloading and reduce technical losses. Alongside this, the IES is pushing for the development of additional high-voltage transmission circuits to boost bulk power transfer across the grid and shore up supply to major load centres,  particularly when demand peaks.

Reinforcing key transmission corridors is also on the list, to create alternative power flow paths and reduce the risk of single-point failures that could cascade into wider outages. Investments in reactive power compensation, the think tank adds, would improve voltage stability and support the integration of renewable energy sources,  an increasingly important consideration as Ghana looks to diversify its energy mix.

The replacement of ageing transformers and substation equipment, the IES argues, has become non-negotiable. These are the bottlenecks quietly undermining system reliability, and clearing them is essential to meeting modern technical standards. Expanding transformation capacity at critical nodes would not only accommodate growing demand but also build in the redundancy needed for a more stable supply.

Reducing both technical and commercial losses across the network is equally critical, improving transmission efficiency and making power delivery more cost-effective for consumers and operators alike.

Finally, the IES points to the untapped potential of stronger regional interconnection. Boosting cross-border electricity trade would not only improve Ghana’s competitiveness in the West African power market but also open the door to generating revenue through electricity exports.

The message from the Institute is unambiguous: the decisions made today about transmission infrastructure will shape the reliability and competitiveness of Ghana’s power sector for decades to come.

“Decisive action is not optional,” the IES stated. “It is imperative.”

Source: Apexnewsgh.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *