GES: Consequences Of Offering Skirt And Blouse Courses – Read And Avoid Them
Education

GES: Consequences Of Offering Skirt And Blouse Courses – Read And Avoid Them

Many teachers who further their studies sometimes get their certificates they acquire undermined due to the wrong choice of courses they offer though they might be education-related courses. This has a lot of negative impacts on persons both in their field of work and their promotion as well. Let’s consider the following frequently asked questions about SKIRT AND BLOUSE COURSES. What is Skirt and Blouse programs choice of degrees? This is when your programs vary in the degrees you have acquired. For instance, an individual who pursued a Bachelor of Education (B.Ed.) in basic education, majored in Mathematics and decides to do Masters of Education (M.Ed.) in educational administration and management, then your first degree is different from your second degree though they are educational programs. What are some of the consequences of such skirt and blouse programs in terms of going high in your educational pursuits and job prospects? Offering skirt blouse courses as already stated above has a lot of negative implications in the Ghana Education Service (GES). Some of these are discussed below; Individuals who offer skirt and blouse programmes as explained above is likely to remain the basic school. Also, issues of upgrading may result in nothing to write home about. This will just be a two (2) incremental jump which is a no objective achieved. Let’s perceive that an individual is not yet employed and is seeking for a job or employment with his/her skirt and blouse certificates, it may be difficult for the person to be employed. Most institutions always want both first and second degrees in the same subject area. This may be very hurtful because you spent not less than GH₵5,000 in to pursue that of the different second degree. However, readers are to note that with respect to the employment prospects attached to the second degree one maybe denied because of the first degree being different. Also, offering skirt and blouse courses limits your any of the certificates you hold and hence will make Jack of all trades but master of none. Furthermore, this violates the policy of same degrees to the top for better experience and work. Another demerit is that if you pursue such programs by sandwich or distance then a full box of stress awaits you as well. What about those who have two degrees in different area, should they choose one and pursue their third degree? If your first degree is different from your second degree, it is advisable to go higher with the second degree as in Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.) or Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) or a third degree that will enable you use your first degree. However, you can choose to the same program in second degree but to me I think it’s a waste of time and resources to prevent any future inconveniences or to escape skirt and blouse programmes, check out the example below: 1. B.Ed. (mathematics education) Or B.Ed. in basic education (Mathematics) 2. M.Ed. in mathematics education. 3. MPhil in mathematics education 4. Ph.D./ M.EdD in mathematics education  With the sandwich, I learnt you will still remain at the basic school? This is a fallacy. What you need to do is must follow up with the same first degree up. With your preference being to teaching at the Senior High School, you need to find your way but, in some cases, if there is a vacancy at the SHS, your district director can post you directly to that school as far as your services are needed provided you do not hold a skirt and blouse certificates. SHARE THIS ARTICLE IF YOU REALLY LIKED IT Please kindly contact apexnewsgh.com on apexnewsgh@gmail.com for your credible news publications

Read More
Tension in Talensi as 11 Tindaama clash with Tongraan over Chinese miners
Mining

Tension in Talensi as 11 Tindaama clash with Tongraan over Chinese miners

Tension is rising in Talensi, a mineral-rich district in the Upper East Region, as traditional landowners (Tindaama) and the Paramount Chief of the area, Tongraan Kugbilsong Nanlebegtang, are seriously engaged in an unusual clash that has also generated disquiet among security watchers. The ‘supremacy war’ is grounded in a recent controversial move by the Earl International Group (GH) Limited—a new name said to have been adopted by the familiar Chinese-owned Shaanxi Mining Ghana Limited— to “unduly” take over more land in the deprived district for large-scale mining purposes. That move, strongly opposed by the natives of the area who say the action was being made without due consultation with the appropriate stakeholders, drew widespread anger with some traditional landowners also petitioning the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to pay no attention to an application letter written by the Earl International Group (GH) Limited to the EPA for permit. Whilst the Tindaama were waiting for a reply to their petition from the end point, the Tongraan wrote to the EPA, urging the agency to ignore the petitioners (the Tindaama). The letter is dated 11th September, 2020, and captioned “Re: Objection to Refrain Earl International Group Ghana (GH) Limited from Mining at the Gbane Gold Project.” And it reads: “Our attention has been drawn to the [above-mentioned] issue said to have been raised by the Tindongo, Duusi and Sawalig Tindamas requesting your outfit [to] not approve of the permit application submitted to your office by Shanxi/ Earl International Mining Group (GH) Ltd. I wish to state that you ignore such a request. The Talensi [Traditional] Council and the paramountcy which is made up of all the traditional rulers (both Chiefs and Tindamas) is the supreme body headed by the Tongraana and it is the supervising authority in the Talensi Traditional Area within the Talensi District. Any matters relating to the mining/land should be brought before the Talensi Council without which remains invalid. “It must be noted that Stool Land Administration in Talensi Traditional [Area] conforms to the Stool Lands Administrations Act 1994, and all issues related to such matters have to be handled and dealt with according to the [laid-down] procedures. The Tongraana has supervisory, jurisdictional and territorial control of the people, land, rivers, etc. in all of ‘Talenteng’ (Talensi Traditional Area). This should be well noted so as not to allow people who are self-seekers and [confusionists] to create any conflict in the area. It should be noted that the paramountcy has for some time tolerated activities of some persons [who] are inciting people in the area to create confusion in the area. The paramountcy advises that such persons should desist from such acts in their own interest.” Your letter full of inaccuracies, jokes and borne out of greed— Tindaama tell Tongraan in rebuttal Eleven traditional landowners wrote back to the EPA, saying the content of the Tongraan’s counter letter was driven by “greed, egoism and parochial interest”. “When we received the letter, the content appeared as though it was a joke considering the number of grammatical errors and the letting out of stream of thoughtless invectives against the Tindaama and the people of such communities as self-seeking and confusionists who only seek to create confusion in the area. Has Tongraan met with the Tindaama he is referring to concerning Earl International Group (GH) Gold Limited’s intention to do large-scale mining in Talenteng? If he has met with them concerning this issue, what decision was taken about the exploration activities on our lands and when was that decision taken? Tongraan should remember that in May, 2018, the Tindaama in a letter stated clearly and unequivocally that they were not ready to co-sign any lease with him or any of his sub-chiefs. Attached is the letter for reference. Why should Tongraan be responding to a letter that was addressed to a state institution responsible and capable of addressing our concerns? “The Tongraan, in an attempt to consolidate his position on the matter, churned out a number of inaccuracies on land ownership and administration in his letter to the EPA. What is his locus in attempting to direct the EPA to ignore our concerns? It must be pointed to the Tongraan that there is no such thing like a supervisory body that controls and supervises lands belonging to individuals or clans when it comes to mining activities. His request should rather be ignored. It only exists in Tongraan’s mind purely borne out of his greed, egoism and parochial interest. Tongraan must know that there is something called Social Licence to Operate (SLO) when it comes to mining. The Social Licence to Operate, though an informal contract with the people, [is] yet very critical for success of any mining activity in a community,” the traditional landowners stated in their reaction. Your continued tyranny, distortions of historical facts unacceptable— Tindaama to Tongraan The Tindaama also rubbished the Tongraan’s reference to the Stool Lands Administration Act 1994. They said his claims stood on “mosquito legs” because “he should know that in the Upper East Region, and Talensi to be precise, lands belong to individuals, families and clans with the Tindaama having the oversight responsibility of such lands and not chiefs”. They made it clear that they would bow under “no amount of inferior tactics” on their demands “to be engaged with, treated fairly and adequately compensated for the use of our lands by Earl International Group (GH) Limited”. “We are determined to galvanise the efforts of the generality of our people to resist Tongraan and his new found friends (Earl International Group (GH) Gold Limited) in respect of exploration activities on our lands without properly engaging us. The current Tongraan, through his actions and behaviour, seems to suggest that we are in a master-servant relationship with him. His continued tyranny, distortions of historical facts, lack of respect for the people of Talensi is unacceptable. He must be told in plain language that no court in Ghana will endorse his attempt to dispossess landowners of their lands

Read More
Teachers not excited with the introduction of wearing professional uniforms To School.
Opinion

Teachers not excited with the introduction of wearing professional uniforms To School.

It is an open secret that Nurses, doctors have uniforms. Lawyers, Judges have uniforms and even Services and Forces like immigration, police, Army, Fire Service have uniforms. Most recognized professions have uniforms except the teaching profession. However, teachers have received the news of “professional uniform” with mixed feelings. While some think that it’s good for teachers to have their own uniform, others vehemently oppose the idea. Counsellor Daniel Fenyi, who spoke to Green 88.5FM last Friday morning, made an appeal to the Government to consider introducing uniforms to the teaching profession just as they have introduced the Teacher License. He argued that teachers spend a lot of money on clothes and dressing, meanwhile, they are not given any clothing allowance. Counsellor Daniel also decried the shabby and faded dresses some teachers take to school. He thinks that when a uniform is introduced, it will reduce the cost of dressing and also reduce the shabby dressings of some teachers. Counsellor also added that a uniform will give teachers some “official” recognition in the public space such as the bank, hospital, transport, etc just as the police, nurses gain recognition when they go to the bank, hospital or sit in public transport. However, some teachers have kicked against Counsellor Daniel’s appeal. They feel a uniform will reduce their status and make them appear childish. For more information, contact Counsellor Daniel Fenyi, Counsellor | Educationist Apexnewsgh.com/Ghana Please kindly contact APEXNEWSGH on Email:apexnewsgh@gmail.com for your credible news publications

Read More
Go back to on Monday GES to SHS 2 And JHS 2 Students
Opinion

Go back to on Monday GES to SHS 2 And JHS 2 Students

Press Statement: SHS 2 And JHS 2 Students To Resume School On Monday – Ghana Education Service Management of the Ghana Education Service (GES) is reminding parents and guardians that SHS 2 and JHS 2 students are to return to school on Monday, October 5, 2020. This is to enable them to complete the 2nd semesters and 3rd terms respectively, which were interrupted by the closure of schools as a result of the coronavirus pandemic. According to the GES, all the necessary measures have been put in place to ensure the safety of students while at school. “All schools have been fumigated and disinfected. In addition Personal Protective Equipment (PPEs) have been distributed to all schools,” the GES assured parents See Press Statement Below

Read More