The First Deputy Speaker of Parliament Mr Joseph Osei Wusu has said the Member of Parliament for Tamale North Alhassan Suhuyini who petitioned the Speaker against his colleague lawmaker for Assin Central Kennedy Agyapong will appear before the Privileges Committee to testify. Speaking to journalists in Parliament on Thursday July 23, the Bekwai lawmaker said the matter will be heard as if it is a court trying an accused person. “It is a member (Alhassan Suhuyini) of the House who petitioned the Speaker so it is the petitioner who will appear before us. If the petitioner decides that he needs somebody else to assist him to prosecute his case, why not. “Remember that when it comes to the privileges committee, it is more or less a trial so our process is no different from the court. “Whatever or however you put your case, you will be guided by the rules of the house, nothing else. “A committee of parliament is only a committee of parliament , we make recommendations to the House so yes, under the rules of parliament whichever recommendations that are permissible under the rules can be made by the committee, decisions are made by the committee.” Meanwhile Mr Suhuyini has said he felt obliged to raise the issues against his colleague Member of Parliament for Assin Central Kennedy Agyapong on the floor of the House because of his background as a journalist. This comes after the Speaker Alban Bagbin has referred Mr Agyapong to the Privileges Committee of Parliament for his utterances against a journalist with the Multimedia Group, Erastus Asare Donkor. Mr Agyapong on Friday, July 9, is reported to have allegedly threatened to attack Mr Asare Donkor, “for the journalistic work that the latter undertook during the recent shootings and killing incident at Ejura” on his television station. The Multimedia Group filed a formal complaint against Mr Agyapong. On Wednesday July 14, Alhassan Suhuyini raised the issue on the floor of the house and asked the Speaker to refer the matter to the Privileges Committee. He said “Mr Speaker, I think that as a former journalist I feel obliged to draw the House’s attention to this conduct of an Honorable colleague of this house which in my view, brings this house into disrepute. “Mr Speaker, I urge you to exercise your powers under 27 and refer this conduct of the Honorable which is becoming unacceptable, to the Privileges Committee to ascertain the veracity of the comments that were made and recommend sanctions if possible that will act as deterrent to other members who may be tempted to act like him.” In response to his request, the Speaker accordingly referred Mr Agyapong to the committee. He said he cannot take a decision on Mr Agyapong over his utterances against a journalist in Ghana. That decision to determine whether or not the conduct smacks of abuse of privileges, he said, rests with the lawmakers as a House, to take. “As it is now, I am compelled to refer it to the Privileges Committee. I want to emphasize that it is the House that will take the decision, it is not the speaker, it is not any other person apart from the House. “That will be your collective wisdom that come to the conclusion whether what is alleged is just a mere allegation or is supported by facts and whether those facts constitute contempt of the House and abuse of a privilege of members. “It is important for me to emphasize here that the privilege and immunity of free speech applies in full force in plenary session and committee sessions, not when members are outside debating issues or on radio and TV. You don’t have that right, that privilege, that immunity to just say anything because you are a member of parliament. “We are not above the law. It is for good reasons because you represent a large number of people, you should be given the full immunity to be able to say what the people say they want you to say. That is why you say it here and you are covered. “That immunity doesn’t extend to you in anywhere else. So pleased the committee should go into the matter, submit the report.” —3news Please contact Apexnewsgh.com on email apexnewsgh@gmail.com for your credible news publications. Contact: 05555568093
Ken Agyapong calls Suhuyini ‘foolish’, ‘stupid’; dares to spill Joy FM ‘corruption’ info
Assin Central MP Kennedy Agyapong has taken Tamale North MP Alhassan Suhuyini to the cleaners for dragging him before the Privileges Committee of the legislature in connection with his threats on Kumasi-based Luv FM’s Erastus Asare Donkor. Speaking on his radio station Oman FM, Mr Agyapong descended on his colleague MP and the Multimedia Group. “As for Suhuyini, the least said about him the better”, Mr Ayapong said, adding: “He goes ahead to drag me before the Privileges Committee? He is a foolish MP. So stupid”. “Left to him, the country would have burnt to ashes. I am so disappointed in him.” The Chairman of the parliamentary select committee on defence and the interior, said Mr Suhuyini “is always politicising issues”. He also expressed reservations with his own party for keeping quiet on certain issues about which the actions taken against him could have also been visited on others on the other side of the aisle. “I am also disappointed in NPP because when Muntaka alleged that the Supreme Court judges are corrupt, no one suggested that he should be dragged before the Privileges Committee”. “You all can go ahead to expel me from parliament if you so wish. Do you think I rely on what I make as an MP? No one can silence me,” he added, Mr Agyapong then turned his guns on Joy FM, saying: “I am surprised at how shameless Joy FM is”. “Before Joy FM will have the moral right to report me, it should first write an apology letter to the families that lost their relatives in the Ejura incident, as well as the individuals who sustained various degrees of injury.” “I stand by my words: they are all corrupt. Kwasi Twum claims he did not tell me in my office that the staff of Joy FM is threatening to sabotage the government because we no longer take care of them. I dare Kwesi Twum to come again.” “If Joy FM pushes me to the wall, I will expose all the information I have gathered about them. I’m going all out. You cannot use the media and police to silence me. I will continue to speak the truth. How can a media house be this corrupt at the detriment of its responsibility to relay the truth? If there will be any disturbances in the country, it’ll arise from Joy FM”, he said. —classfm Please contact Apexnewsgh.com on email apexnewsgh@gmail.com for your credible news publications. Contact: 05555568093
Akufo-Addo’s comments ‘seemed like mob justice endorsement’ – Suhuyini
Alhassan Suhuyini MP for Tamale North has said President Nana Akufo-Addo’s endorsement of the burning of galamsey excavators appears to be an endorsement of mob justice. Speaking at a sod-cutting ceremony for the construction of the Law Village Project in Accra on Wednesday, 26 April 2021, Nana Akufo-Addo asked his critics to go to court for redress if they were unhappy with his approach. The President said: “I know there are some who believe that the ongoing exercise of ridding our water bodies and forest zones of harmful equipment and machinery is unlawful and, in some cases, harsh”. “I strongly disagree, and I would advise those who take a contrary view to go to court to vindicate their position if they so wish. That is what the rule of law is all about.” “The Ghana Law Reports of modern times are littered with cases in which my clients thought it necessary to challenge government action. On the majority of occasions, the courts upheld my contentions, in a few others, they did not. Reacting to the president’s comments, the main opposition National Democratic Congress lawmaker told journalists in parliament that “for someone of his calibre, supposed to be a lawyer of long-standing, the comments that he made after that particular suggestion that people could go to court, was a bit disturbing to me”. For example, Mr Suhuyini argued that for the president to have suggested that “no rights could accrue to anybody engaged in an illegal enterprise”, he to be pronouncing judgment on the people involved even before they step in court. “And, if you know how our system works and especially the perceptions around the system and how it works, you would be careful, as a president engaged in what he’s engaged in, through the military, asking people to go to court and not stopping there but just giving a final judgment on the matter that no rights could accrue [to the suspects] and for me, it actually seemed like an endorsement of mob justice”, Mr Suhuyini noted. He explained: “I said the president’s comments seemed like an endorsement of mob justice because it sounded as if to say that if one is caught in the act of stealing, anything else done to that person, like slapping or kicking and beating is alright”. “That is, perhaps, the kind of mindset with which the president is approaching this fight against galamsey”, the MP said. He intimated that “nobody is against this fight and nobody calling for a better approach in winning the fight, is anti-this fight”. The president, he said, “must get that clear”. Mr Suhuyini said the calls for a better approach are informed by “one, our past and the fact that we have embarked on this journey of burning of excavators before and the fact that such acts led to further burdens of judgment debts on the state in some cases and, so, the president cannot be so sure that these military officers will not engage in excesses, as they embark on this destruction, that would lead to the state having to cough out money to compensate people by way of judgment debt because it has happened before”. Please contact Apexnewsgh.com on email apexnewsgh@gmail.com for your credible news publications. Contact: 05555568093









