The Attorney General, Godfred Yeboah Dame has suggested to Parliament that their resolution they passed asking the General Legal Counsel and the Ghana School of law to admit LLB students who obtained 50 percent pass mark, is not binding. The AG said Parliament is devoid of power through the use of Parliamentary resolutions, to control the process of admission into the Ghana School of Law. Parliament on Friday, October 29 resolved that all LLB students who obtained a 50 percent pass mark in the law school entrance examinations should be admitted. The unanimous decision was arrived at by voice votes in Parliament. But in a response, the AG said “Respectfully, I am aware of a resolution passed by Parliament at its sitting on Friday, 29th October 2021 in these terms: The General Legal Council is hereby directed to proceed and admit all the students who passed in accordance with the advertised rules of the examinations. The Attorney-General is the leader of the bar in Ghana and he must see to it that the directive that 499 students who scored 50 marks are admitted is complied with. “We do not want to get to contempt of Parliament issues. Whilst recognizing the general legislative powers of Parliament in Ghana, except as have been circumscribed by the Constitution, I am constrained to advise that Parliament is devoid of power through the use of Parliamentary resolutions, to control the process of admission into the Ghana School of Law. “The mode of exercising legislative power enshrined in article 106 of the Constitution does not admit of resolutions. “In accordance with section 13(1)(e) and (f) of the Legal Profession Act, 1960 (Act 32), the power to regulate the admission of students to pursue courses of instruction leading to qualification as lawyers and to hold examinations which may include preliminary, intermediate and final examinations has been vested in the General Legal Counsel. It is correct that section 1(5) of Act 32 stipulates thus, “The Council shall in the performance of their functions comply with any general directions given by the Minister”. In my respectful opinion, this provision underscores the capacity of the Executive, not the Legislature, through the Minister responsible for the General Legal Council, i.e. the Attorney-General and Minister for Justice, to direct and advise the Council on major matters of national importance. In this regard, it is pertinent to indicate that by a letter dated 18th October, 2021 received at my office on 21 October 2021, His Excellency the President forwarded the contents of a petition by the “499 candidates” to me for my comments in order to enable him to respond. Another petition dated 20th October 2021 by the National Association of Law Students was also delivered to the President. “Upon delivery of my comments on the matters raised in both petitions and following further consultations with my good self, by a letter dated 26th October 2021 (three clear days before the resolution of Parliament), received at my office on 27th October, 2021, the President directed me to, pursuant to section 1(5) of Act 32, … make the necessary intervention to the General Legal Council, on behalf of the 499 students, to address the issue. “Within the constraints of the law, I am following up on the directive of the President to make the necessary interventions on behalf of the ‘499 students’ Be that as it may, it is imperative to correct a few erroneous impressions contained in the impugned Parliamentary resolution of 29th October 2021.The notice in the Daily Graphic of 14th May, 2021 inviting applications from suitably qualified Ghanaians for admission into the Ghana School of Law did not state a pass mark of fifty percent (50%) or any at all as a basis for admission. The notice stated that applicants may be granted admission if they have passed the entrance examination conducted by the GLC. “The notice also did not state the manner in which a pass mark set by the GLC would be determined. It is clear, therefore, that, a contention that the “originally announced” or “advertised” pass mark was “50%”, is erroneous and insupportable. In so far as any matter bordering on a ‘pass mark’ is concerned, the notice in the Daily Graphic stated as follows: “Admission Procedure” The admission process is as follows: (i) The General Legal Council determines the number of candidates to be admitted to the Professional Law Course for the academic year. () Applicants may be granted admission if they have passed the written examinations organized by the General Legal Council for the 20221/2022 Academic Year, on payment of the required fee and submission of the application form and all supporting documents required online. On this same issue, the Executive Director of the Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana), Professor Henry Kwasi Prempeh also said the resolution was not binding. Prof Prempeh who is also a Ghanaian lawyer explained on the Key Points on TV3/3FM Saturday October 30, with host Dzifa Bampoh that Parliament makes a number of resolutions, of which some are binding and others are not. The one directed to the GLC and the law school, he said, falls in the latter category. Prof Prempeh said, “I am delighted to see Parliament really weigh in on this matter. This is a long-running battle and I think that it is good to have the political class weigh-in this way. “Parliament makes decisions in a number of ways. They can pass a bill, if signed it becomes an Act of Parliament. It also operates by passing resolutions. Some of the resolutions are binding, some are not binding”. “This is one of the resolutions in the latter category, it is not binding. But, it does register Parliament’s collective disapproval of the way and manner in which a statutory body like the GLC has been handling this matter of access to legal education.” During the debate on the floor of the Huse on Friday October 29, Member of Parliament for Asawase, Alhaji Muntaka Mubarak told the
