More Trouble For KK Sarpong’s US$1.6 Billion Aker/AGM Transaction -As Italians Denies His Claims While Energy Experts Punch Holes In His Arguments GNPC CEO Dr K.K. Sarpong
Business

More Trouble For KK Sarpong’s US$1.6 Billion Aker/AGM Transaction -As Italians Denies His Claims While Energy Experts Punch Holes In His Arguments

The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Ghana National Petroleum Corporation (GNPC), Dr. Kofi Koduah Sarpong, continues to push his luck by courting support for the questionable acquisition of Aker Energy’s stakes in the Deepwater Tano Cape Three Points (DWT/CTP) and South Deepwater Tano (SDWT) blocks offshore Ghana. He had claimed that, the Italian energy giant was leaving Ghana, but this has turned out to be untrue as Eni is not going anywhere. Rather the company plans to make more investment here in Ghana the same way it is doing in Côte d’Ivoire. They insisted that his claim was false. In his latest attempt to court their support, Dr. Sarpong and his team, met selected Civil Society Organization (CSOs), alongside pro-government media and students of University of Ghana to further the government agenda. Experts have observed that what he is failing to mention to the CSOs and the others is that globally, and especially in Ghana, majors are not the only key players in exploration. Kosmos Energy, Tullow and Anadarko, the trailblazers in Ghana’s major field, are all independents. Some top tier companies may be shifting focus, however, mergers and acquisitions (M&A) activity in the oil and gas sector is still boisterous for quality assets. In fact one needs not look far for evidence of this. Kosmos Energy right here has just acquired Anadarko’s stakes in Ghana’s Jubilee and TEN fields. Eni ain’t going nowhere It is surprising that Dr. Sarpong and his team, would include Eni among his list of “majors shifting away from oil and gas,” since facts available to them make it clear that the Italian oil giant ‘ain’t going nowhere,’ as the Americans would put it. Eni, the Sankofa-GyeNyame field operator, is bent on developing their recent Ghana Block 4 discovery and also negotiating for another block in Ghana, to increase their Ghana assets to three. It is therefore a lie for anybody, especially Dr. Sarpong, with the facts available to him to suggest that Eni was shifting away from oil and gas in the sub-region. Again, right across Ghana’s western border, the President of Côte d’Ivoire Alassane Ouattara and Eni CEO Claudio Descalzi met at the beginning of this month to discuss the progress of Eni’s activities in the country, following the giant offshore discovery of Baleine 1-X. When contacted on GNPC’s claim that the company plans to exit West Africa, Eni stated that its decarbonisation strategy is a public document and nowhere does it state it wants to exit or create a subsidiary to manage its assets. “We are an established E&P company with technology and record. We have no plans to downplay that even as we push for net zero”, a source at Eni told The Herald. Indeed, a release by Eni on October 2, said Eni CEO and President Ouattara discussed Baleine’s appraisal and fast-track development plans. This is information that must be available to the GNPC boss and his team, as their roles require they are abreast with developments in the sub-region as well.. “Baleine’s potential is estimated in excess of 2 billion barrels of oil in place and about 2.4 trillion cubic feet (TCF) of associated gas. Its significant gas volumes will contribute to power generation in Côte d’Ivoire, strengthening the country’s role as a regional energy hub,” the release stated. The negotiations also covered critical areas for knowledge and skills transfer to ensure value retention by the Ivorian resource owners, including a collaboration between Eni Corporate University (ECU) and Ecole Supérieure du Pétrole et de l’Energie to develop competencies and human capital. These clear examples of practical steps towards capacity building are conspicuously missing from ongoing discussions around the operatorship aspiration by GNPC. Baleine-1x is the first operated exploration well drilled by Eni in Côte d’Ivoire in the CI-101 block, with the Ivorian national oil company (NOC) Petroci Holding. In addition to the CI-101 block, Eni owns a stake in four other blocks in the Ivorian deepwater: CI-205, CI-501, CI-504 and CI-802, all with the same partner Petroci Holding. In the case of British Petroleum (BP), it has committed to transitioning from an oil and gas company to an energy company by 2050, but targeted reducing oil and gas production by up to 40% by 2030. CEO Bernard Looney has made it clear in a webcast Q and A session on presenting BP’s first quarter report that, “the key thing going forward around divestments is we are not in a hurry. We are just not in a rush.” Critical questions remain unanswered In his presentation to CSOs, Dr. Sarpong states 40,000 bopd as projected production by 2024 from Pecan Phase 1A, 40,000 bopd by 2027 from Pecan 1B, 60, 000 bopd by 2027 from Nyankom and 60,000 bopd from Pecan Phase 2 by 2030. Industry watchers believe that the projection of 40,000 bopd in 2024 is unimpressive, while the other additions to grow production to 200,000 are suspiciously unsustainable. Reserved volumes are not conjured. Reserves certification or audit is carried out by globally recognised entities like DeGolyer, MacNaughton, Gaffney Kline, and Ryder Scott. Therefore for us the critical, yet unanswered questions remain: How were the contingent resources of 717 million barrels confirmed? How were “Substantial prospects in the two blocks, especially SDWT”, arrived at? Can Dr. Sarpong and his team produce the technical audit or certification from a reputable entity on the above? When were the valuations carried out? The Herald, had earlier reported on surreptitious lobbying by Mr Sarpong and his agents, of some key CSO leaders, especially in oil and gas and government policy sectors, ahead of presenting the proposal to Parliament, either to buy their support or silence their opposition. —theheraldgh Disclaimer: “The views/contents expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of ApexnewsGhana. ApexnewsGhana will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article.”

Read More
K.K. Sarpong ‘appears more as Aker’s spokesperson than GNPC CEO’ – Ben Boakye GNPC CEO Dr K.K. Sarpong
Business

K.K. Sarpong ‘appears more as Aker’s spokesperson than GNPC CEO’ – Ben Boakye

The Executive Director of the Africa Centre for Energy Policy (ACEP), Mr Benjamin Boakye, has said the CEO of the Ghana National Petroleum Corporation (GNPC), Dr K.K. Sarpong appears more of a spokesperson for Aker Energy than the arrowhead for the state oil company. In an article responding to some assertions made by Dr Sarpong against civil society organisations who have raised concerns about GNPC’s bid to acquire stakes in Aker and AGM oil blocs, Mr Boakye said: “The most worrying part of Dr. Sarpong’s public commentary is his extreme lack of control over the transaction he champions”. “It could be deliberate but the accompanying risk for Ghana is chilling”, Mr Boakye noted, adding: “He appears more as a spokesperson for Aker than GNPC, defending and changing numbers to make Aker look good”. “Dr Sarpong says he is not aware of Aker looking to sell its assets without success. This is not just unbelievable; it portrays a lack of attention to detail in his bid to short-change the public. If GNPC did any due diligence on why Aker wanted to sell, they would have chanced on online publications and direct quotes from the CEO of Aker Energy that they were looking for investors, including a possible sale of stakes to the market. That would have helped GNPC to investigate why they failed to get any buyer”, he said. In his article, Mr Boakye said: “Dr Sarpong doesn’t have control over the few numbers involved in this transaction. His struggle to remember what is informing the transactions only leaves him accusing CSOs of ignorance. All of a sudden, he is putting out new numbers different from what he presented to Parliament. He told Parliament that the total cost incurred by Aker is $800 million; this included an ambiguous $280 million described as money spent on other activities. Now Dr. Sarpong is quoting $399.2 million as the total cost incurred. It appears we are now making progress in the attempt to clean the transaction. Perhaps the more heat he gets, the lower the numbers for Ghana”. Read Mr Boakye’s full statement below: Ben Boakye asks: Who can compete with GNPC’s Kahuna to drive me more nervous? I have followed a series of interviews granted by Dr. KK Sarpong and sometimes froze, literally, in complete disbelief of what damage he is doing to the country in an attempt to litter the media space with hate for CSOs. By design or not, he injects extreme nervousness than I have seen. The strategy was evident; he pontificates his achievements in public life to sedate the minds of Ghanaians to think that he is doing the right thing with the Aker transaction. He tries hard to discredit CSOs in the crudest way possible, so the public will listen to him, not the CSOs. Additionally, he displays an unpardonable lack of control over the Aker transaction, which makes his amnesia of the history of Aker/AGM in Ghana almost forgivable. For the avoidance of doubt, CSOs have deliberately abstained from personalising this transaction, but we are capable of descending that lane. On Peace FM, Dr. Sarpong claimed an outstanding achievement of consigning Ghana Cocoa Board (Cocobod) to a debt-procuring enterprise for almost three decades. He owned the idea to syndicate loans to purchase cocoa beans, a practice that has escalated from borrowing hundreds of millions in the 1990s to billions today. Dr Sarpong should note that CSOs will not celebrate his legacy of debt procurement, instead of building capital for the trade of a commodity that Ghana continues to play a dominant role in the global supply market. It is even shocking that the GNPC Kahuna goes way back into time to account for his public life with such surgical precision on what he thinks is public-worthy. I would have thought that the most relevant and recent context of his public life to the ongoing Aker transaction is his stewardship of Tema Oil Refinery (TOR). TOR was handed to Dr Sarpong with total debt of about $400 million. At the time, the State needed the genius to save the company. Not only that, the public was billed, through the TOR Debt Recovery Levy, to support Dr. Sarpong to turn the company’s fortunes around. Instead, he left the company with a debt of over $1.4 billion, having received about $580m from the levy. In 2015, a government committee, with the Bureau of National Investigations (BNI) and KPMG, recommended further investigation into the debt and use of funds at TOR. However, as vulnerable as the Ghanaian public is, he gets rewarded with a more significant portfolio in GNPC. Here again, his stewardship of the Corporation thus far remains a template of “how not to run a national oil company,” which will remain a subject of academic scrutiny for so long. He frustrated ExxonMobil on the selections of a local partner for one whole year, creating inactivity on Exxon’s block until Government compromised on Goil. Under his watch, the Government has paid about $260 million for unutilised domestic gas and flared about $200million worth of gas in 2020 alone. At the same time, Dr. Sarpong spends his time negotiating the import of LNG at an additional cost of about $300 million a year to the public on a take-or-pay contract, ignoring the warnings of IMF on the fiscal consequences in its article IV report for 2021. He demonises existing investors with his kitchen engineers, then comes out in the open crying about exiting investors and blaming energy transition. Aker’s jackpot is only one of many bad judgments of GNPC under his leadership. To avoid public scrutiny of the Aker transaction, the Kahuna of GNPC spends time bastardising CSOs and craftily portraying that we lack knowledge of the entire transaction. However, it gets too apparent that if he paid little attention to CSOs, some nervy moments in his interviews, which I will return to shortly, would have been avoided. On the point of lack of knowledge, he got worryingly deflated by

Read More